Riassunti VERIFICATO
comparative law summary
30 visualizzazioni
42 download
Nessun voto ancora
Di cosa parla
- Comparative Law Fundamentals: Explores the definition, aims (knowledge, prejudice dissolution, law reform via transplants), and functions (aid to legislators, interpretation, uniform law) of comparative law.
- Methods: Focuses on functionalism as the core comparative method, comparing institutions based on their common functions. It also discusses the factual approach and Sacco's theory of 'legal formats' (statutes, doctrines, case law).
- Historical Context (Paris 1900 & St. Louis 1904): Details the initial Eurocentric push for a 'Uniform Law' at the Paris 1900 Congress and the subsequent, more practical American approach at St. Louis 1904, critiquing the utopian ideal of uniformity and emphasizing the value of legal pluralism.
- Romano-Germanic Legal Family: Characterized by a distinct public/private law separation and the profound influence of Roman law, as propagated by early universities and legal institutions.
- French Civil Code (1804): Presented as a product of Napoleonic reforms, it codified law based on Roman templates, establishing key principles like judicial restraint (judges as 'bouche de la lois').
- German Legal Model (BGB 1900): Contrasts with the French approach, rooted in Savigny's 'spirit of the people' and the systematic conceptualization of Roman law by the pandectist school.
- Diffusion of European Codes: Explains the spread of European legal models worldwide, driven by military conquest, colonialism, and 'soft power' prestige, with the Code Napoleon as a prime example.
- Americanization of Law: Discusses the globalization of legal thought through different phases (Classical, Socially oriented, Universalistic Legal Consciousness), leading to the prominence of US legal concepts and human rights.
- Constitutional Identity: Defined as a dynamic concept influenced by a constitution's text, cultural context, and other national identities. It outlines seven constitutional models and six types of constitution-making processes.
- Constitutional Preambles: Examines preambles as reflections of constitutional identity, detailing their formal and substantive aspects, common content (historical narratives, ideals), linguistic styles, and varying legal status (soft, hard, or supporting).
- Constitutional Review: Describes it as the power of a court to assess a law's constitutionality, marking a shift from parliamentary supremacy to constitutional democracy. It differentiates between two main models: the decentralized/diffuse model (e.g., US) where multiple courts can review, and the centralized model (e.g., Kelsenian, with a dedicated constitutional court).