Appunti VERIFICATO

Theories of Punishment

Università degli Studi di Torino global law and transnational legal studies 2022
25 visualizzazioni
33 download
★ 4,5 (1)
Condividi: WhatsApp Telegram
Anteprima pagina 1 — Theories of Punishment Anteprima pagina 2 — Theories of Punishment Anteprima pagina 3 — Theories of Punishment

Di cosa parla

  • The document examines two primary theories of punishment: Instrumentalism (Utilitarianism) and Retributivism.
  • Instrumentalism justifies punishment by its anticipated positive effects, such as re-education, rehabilitation, and deterrence. It encompasses:
    • Preventive strategies: Removing dangerous individuals from society.
    • Deterrence: Using punishment as a threat to reduce crimes, both specific (reducing recidivism) and general (reducing overall crime).
    • Rehabilitation practices: Promoting the reintegration of offenders.
    However, instrumentalism is criticized for:
    • Not punishing according to 'desert,' potentially leading to disproportionate sentences.
    • Treating offenders as a means to an end, thus dehumanizing them (a key critique from Immanuel Kant).
    • The risk of injustice and unlimited suffering for individuals and minorities in the pursuit of social goals.
  • Retributivism justifies punishment retrospectively, based on the crime committed and the offender's decision to break the law. Key proponents include:
    • Hegel: Punishment nullifies the crime, serving as a retribution that 'disappears' the offense morally and legally, emphasizing proportionality.
    • Kant: Argues punishment is deserved due to free choice, but must respect human dignity and impose limits on violence.
    Criticisms against retributivism include:
    • Its moral status, questioning if it's an alternative to revenge or merely institutionalized revenge.
    • Difficulty in defining 'intelligibility' and 'proportionality' – what exact punishment a crime 'deserves.'
    • The influence of emotions, rather than pure rationality, in determining social reactions to crimes.
  • A Critical Perspective on Criminal Justice and Punishment highlights practical discrepancies:
    • Empirical research reveals significant unfairness in trial procedures and discrimination against women and ethnic minorities.
    • The 'ideology of equality' often conflicts with concrete practices, serving as an instrument of oppression.
    • The Enlightenment liberal idea of the 'mens rea' (free rational agent) is challenged, positing that individuals have 'limited rationality' and are influenced by social context.
    • The prison system, viewed as 'total institutions' (Erving Goffman), often fails to rehabilitate offenders, leading to high recidivism and human rights violations.
    • Feminist critique underscores how legal systems reflect male perspectives, leading to 'formal equality' that perpetuates 'concrete injustice,' particularly in cases of domestic violence and rape where victims are often re-victimized by the system.
    • Despite these deep-seated issues, there's a growing international awareness of human rights and ongoing efforts to promote social justice and rights for minorities.

Altri appunti di PHILOSOPHY OF LAW

Condividi questi appunti

WhatsApp Telegram