Appunti VERIFICATO

hart

Università degli Studi di Torino giurisprudenza 2022
17 visualizzazioni
17 download
Nessun voto ancora
Anteprima pagina 1 — hart Anteprima pagina 2 — hart

Di cosa parla

  • **Herbert Hart's Enduring Influence:** Hart revolutionized legal thought, becoming a central figure. His analytical style, similar to Locke, made his complex ideas accessible and impactful on civil debates in liberal democracies.
  • **The Separation of Law and Morals:** Hart's core theory posited a strict separation between law and morality, rejecting any necessary logical connection. He affirmed law as positive law, even advocating for retroactive laws over natural law concessions. However, he recognized a "minimum content of natural law" derived from universal human vulnerabilities and limitations.
  • **Key Concepts from "The Concept of Law" (1961):**
    • He distinguished between **primary rules** (imposing obligations) and **secondary rules** (conferring powers).
    • The **rule of recognition** is a crucial secondary rule that allows legal officials and citizens to identify valid laws within a system.
    • Hart differentiated between the **external point of view** (observing behavior) and the **internal point of view** (adopting rules as guides for conduct).
  • **Validity and Efficacy:** While individual norms can be valid without being effective, an entire legal system must be effective to be considered valid. The very existence of the rule of recognition implies its general efficacy.
  • **Theory of Legal Interpretation:** Hart introduced the concept of the "open texture" of law, meaning laws are general and abstract, requiring interpretation to apply to specific cases. This process involves judicial discretion and a degree of law-making within set legislative limits.
  • **The Hart-Devlin Debate on Legal Enforcement of Morals:**
    • Hart famously debated Patrick Devlin on whether society should enforce morality through law, especially concerning "victimless crimes" (e.g., homosexuality, prostitution) in England.
    • Hart supported the **Wolfenden Report**, which recommended that law should not intervene in private moral conduct that does not harm others.
    • **Devlin's "disintegration thesis"** argued that shared moral values are essential for societal cohesion; thus, enforcing these morals through law is necessary to prevent societal breakdown.
    • **Hart's Rebuttals to Devlin:** Hart challenged Devlin's static view of morality, arguing that societal values are dynamic. He also rejected the "slippery slope" argument and asserted that not all immoral acts should be criminalized, even if some are.
    • Ultimately, the legal systems in the UK and later the US (in sodomy law cases) moved towards positions aligned with Hart's arguments.
  • **Hart's Legacy and Subsequent Shifts:** Hart's work in the 1960s cemented legal positivism's focus on "law as it is." The 1970s saw a shift with John Rawls' "A Theory of Justice," which redirected attention to "law as it ought to be," reintroducing normative considerations into legal philosophy.

Condividi questi appunti

WhatsApp Telegram